PERSONAL LINK REQUIRED

Please open your personal survey link

This survey uses personal invitation links so that your answers are saved for you. Please open the link from your invitation e-mail. If you cannot find it, contact the survey coordinator.

Consortium survey · Working version 1.0

NGRA — Interactive Consortium Decision Map

Agree on the NGRA definition, collect partner strategies and references, then build an adaptable evidence-based workflow together.

Discussion tool only · Not an endorsed EFSA framework · All recommendations and module rules are editable.

Loading your personal survey…
ABOUT YOU

Your details and consent

Your answers are saved automatically on the survey server while you type, so you can close the page and continue later with the same personal link. When you are done, click Submit my response at the bottom of the page.

DECISION 1

What do we mean by NGRA?

Proposed working definition. Edit the wording or record an alternative. This definition is intentionally broad enough to support different NGRA workflows and regulatory contexts.

PARTNER INPUT

NGRA strategy proposals and references

An open space for consortium partners to share existing NGRA frameworks, propose new assessment strategies, and identify what could be adopted or further developed. Proposals are not automatically accepted as consortium decisions.

How to contribute: Add one proposal per strategy, identify the proposing partner, attach PDF documents or figures, explain the approach and record its potential relevance for EFSA-oriented NGRA. You can edit or remove your entries. Attachments are uploaded to the survey server together with your answers and will be included in the consortium summary.

PDF, PNG, JPEG and WebP attachments, up to 15 MB per file. Do not attach confidential material unless consortium sharing rules permit it.

DECISION 2

Build the NGRA workflow

Click a module to edit or delete it (including starter modules). Drag a module to another position, or use the Move up / Move down buttons. The map is a proposed starting layout, not a fixed obligatory sequence. Modules may be parallel; a decision gate can end the workflow once the necessary evidence is sufficient.

Reorder: drag a module to a new position. Or select it and use Move up / Move down. The exported report follows your chosen order.

SELECT A MODULE

Problem formulation

Basic assumptions for NAM-based evidence integration

Open discussion: How should complementary NAM-based evidence be combined and interpreted within this module? Add multiple proposals or assumptions, including how evidence is weighted, linked to mechanisms, compared across methods and assessed for uncertainty.

Nanomaterial risk assessment — additional information

Changes are saved automatically.

FINISH

Submit your response

Your answers are already saved on the server while you work. Click Submit my response to tell the coordinator that your input is complete. You can still change your answers after submitting, until the survey closes; the latest saved version is used for the summary.

Personal copies (optional)

Download a copy of your own answers as a plain-text file (.txt) or a Word-compatible document (.doc). The backup file (.json) contains everything you entered, including attachments. If you already filled in the earlier offline version of this tool, you can import its saved workspace file (.json) here and your answers will be uploaded to the survey.